Practical method
A review checklist for video hooks, scripts, storyboards, shot lists and edit notes. The goal is not to make prompts longer. The goal is to make the request clearer, easier to verify and more useful in a real workflow.
A good prompt usually includes role, task, context, constraints, examples, output format and a review loop.
Step-by-step process
- Write the real task in plain language.
- Add context: audience, constraints, examples and unavailable details.
- Ask for a first draft and missing-information questions.
- Request a critique against your goal.
- Revise the prompt and save the version that worked.
Research Prompts Context Builder
Best for: teams working on research plans, interview guides, source synthesis and insight extraction in general work
Act as a senior research specialist. You are helping a team in general work create a research plan. First, restate the goal in one sentence. Use this context: [context]. Audience: [audience]. Constraints: [constraints]. Brand or communication tone: [tone]. Your task is to collect missing context before trying to create a research plan. Return a usable research plan plus rationale, checklist and next step. Include: 1) a ready-to-use draft, 2) a short rationale, 3) a review checklist, and 4) three missing-information questions if the context is incomplete. Do not invent facts, prices, policies or results that are not provided.
Example input: Goal: create a research plan; scenario: unstructured reading, weak questions and missed patterns; deliverable needed: research plan; constraint: keep it specific and reviewable.
Expected output: research plan with a clear structure, one example, and a review checklist
Research Prompts First Draft
Best for: teams working on research plans, interview guides, source synthesis and insight extraction in general work
Act as a senior research specialist. You are helping a team in general work create a research plan. First, restate the goal in one sentence. Use this context: [context]. Audience: [audience]. Constraints: [constraints]. Brand or communication tone: [tone]. Your task is to produce a usable research plan for team. Return a usable research plan plus rationale, checklist and next step. Include: 1) a ready-to-use draft, 2) a short rationale, 3) a review checklist, and 4) three missing-information questions if the context is incomplete. Do not invent facts, prices, policies or results that are not provided.
Example input: Goal: create a research plan; scenario: unstructured reading, weak questions and missed patterns; deliverable needed: interview guide; constraint: keep it specific and reviewable.
Expected output: interview guide with a clear structure, one example, and a review checklist
Research Prompts Critique and Improve
Best for: teams working on research plans, interview guides, source synthesis and insight extraction in general work
Act as a senior research specialist. You are helping a team in general work create a research plan. First, restate the goal in one sentence. Use this context: [context]. Audience: [audience]. Constraints: [constraints]. Brand or communication tone: [tone]. Your task is to audit the interview guide against the real goal and constraints. Return a usable research plan plus rationale, checklist and next step. Include: 1) a ready-to-use draft, 2) a short rationale, 3) a review checklist, and 4) three missing-information questions if the context is incomplete. Do not invent facts, prices, policies or results that are not provided.
Example input: Goal: create a research plan; scenario: unstructured reading, weak questions and missed patterns; deliverable needed: synthesis table; constraint: keep it specific and reviewable.
Expected output: synthesis table with a clear structure, one example, and a review checklist
Errores comunes
- Using a one-line request like “write something about research” with no audience or constraints.
- Asking for the final answer before collecting the context the AI needs.
- Publishing output without checking facts, dates, product details or policy-sensitive claims.
- Requesting many versions without defining what “good” means.
- Letting the AI decide the structure when the page, email or report already has a known format.
Lista de revisión
- The prompt states the user role and business context.
- The output format is explicit enough to review quickly.
- The prompt asks for missing-information questions instead of invented details.
- The answer includes a checklist or next step, not only a paragraph.
- Claims, numbers, policies and examples are checked before use.
Preguntas frecuentes
What is the fastest way to improve a prompt?
Add specific context, output format and success criteria.
Should prompts be very long?
Not always. A prompt should be complete enough to guide the output, but not padded with irrelevant words.
How do I know the result is good?
Compare it against the original goal, check facts and ask whether a real user can act on it.
Calidad editorial
Score: 78/100
Robots: noindex,follow
Esta página es útil para usuarios, pero no se incluye en el sitemap hasta superar revisión editorial.